Does intraoperative patellar eversion affect clinical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty? An evidence-based meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aims to compare the early postoperative recovery, complications encountered, length of hospital stay, and initial functional scores between patellar eversion and non-eversion manoeuvres in patients undergoing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on clinical studies available in the literature. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 1, 2000 and August 12, 2022. Prospective trials comparing clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing TKA with and without patellar eversion manoeuvre were included. The meta-analysis was performed using Rev-Man version 5.41 (Cochrane Collaboration). Pooled-odds ratios (for categorical data) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (for continuous data) were calculated (p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant). RESULTS: Ten (out of the 298 publications identified in this subject) were included for the meta-analysis. The patellar eversion group (PEG) had a significantly shorter tourniquet time [mean difference (MD) - 8.91 min; p = 0.002], although the overall intraoperative blood loss was higher (IOBL; MD 93.02 ml; p = 0.0003). The patellar retraction group (PRG), on the other hand, revealed statistically better early clinical outcomes in terms of shorter time necessary to perform active straight leg raising (MD 0.66, p = 0.0001), shorter time to achieve 90° knee-flexion (MD 0.29, p = 0.03), higher degree of knee flexion achieved at 90 days (MD - 1.90, p = 0.03), and reduced length of hospital stay (MD 0.65, p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in the early complication rates, 36-item short-form health survey (1 year), visual analogue scores (1 year), and Insall-Salvati index at follow-up between the groups. CONCLUSION: The implications from the evaluated studies suggest that in comparison with patellar eversion, patellar retraction manoeuvre during surgery provides significantly faster recovery of quadriceps function, earlier attainment of functional knee range of motion (ROM), and shorter length of hospital stay in patients undergoing TKA.

Nail insertion points in semi-extended nailing of tibial fractures and their influence on alignment: A retrospective cohort study comparing two nail insertion techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Semi-extended tibial nailing techniques include the extra-articular technique (EAT) and the patellar eversion technique (PET). These approaches differ regarding the exposure of the patellar retinaculum and the size of the surgical field. This study compared the postoperative alignment and intramedullary nailing entry points between the EAT and PET for tibial fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 54 patients (aged ≥18 years) who had undergone intramedullary nailing by the EAT (n = 29) or PET (n = 25) for a tibial shaft fracture were evaluated. The intramedullary nailing entry point and postoperative alignment were measured, and the 1-year postoperative follow-up results were compared. RESULTS: For the EAT and PET, the intramedullary nailing entry point was located at a mean distance of 4.04 mm medial to the optimal entry point and 0.27 mm lateral to the optimal entry point, respectively. The mean angular deformation observed in anteroposterior radiographs following surgery using the EAT and PET were 2.49° and 0.32° valgus, respectively. CONCLUSION: The intramedullary nailing entry point affected postoperative alignment. Intramedullary nailing may result in malalignment while performing the EAT due to the interference of the patella at the time of nailing.

Tratamiento de la fractura conminuta de patela: ¿existen diferencias entre realizar o no una eversión? / Treatment of comminuted patellar fracture: are there differences between performing or not performing an eversion?

OBJETIVO Comparar los resultados clínicos, funcionales e imagenológicos de dos técnicas quirúrgicas para el manejo de fracturas conminutas de patela: con y sin eversión patelar. MÉTODOS En una serie de casos retrospectivos de fracturas conminutas de patela tratadas en el mismo centro entre 2014 y 2017, con un seguimiento ≥ 3 meses, se hizo una comparación entre el grupo con eversión y el grupo sin eversión. Los criterios de exclusión fueron patelectomía parcial o total, reinserción tendínea, o rehabilitación incompleta. Las variables analizadas fueron edad, sexo, tabaquismo, diabetes mellitus, energía del accidente, tipo de fractura, variables quirúrgicas (banda de tensión, tornillos, alambres, nudos, cerclaje circular), rango de movimiento (RDM) articular postoperatorio, presencia de osteosíntesis sintomática, puntaje de escalas funcionales (de Tegner-Lysholm y de Kujala) al alta definitiva, complicaciones (rigidez articular, infección, trombosis venosa profunda), y variables imagenológicos con tomografías computarizadas pre- y postoperatorias (brecha, desnivel articular > 2 mm, elementos de fijación intraarticular). RESULTADOS En total, 20 de 22 pacientes, 13 con eversión y 7 sin eversión, cumplieron con los criterios de selección. El seguimiento fue de 3 a 12 meses, y no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas respecto a las variables demográficas entre ambos grupos, lo cual los hace comparables. Destacaron el tiempo desde el ingreso al alta, con 7 meses para los pacientes con eversión y 5 meses para los sin eversión (p = 0.032), la proporción de pacientes con desnivel articular > 2 mm, con 7.7% para los con eversión y 14.3% para los sin eversión (p = 0.016), y una tendencia a resultados superiores en escalas funcionales para el grupo con eversión. CONCLUSIÓN El tratamiento de fracturas conminutas de patela con eversión parece ser una alternativa viable dados sus resultados imagenológicos y funcionales superiores a los de la técnica habitual.

PURPOSE To compare the clinical, functional and imaging outcomes of two surgical techniques for the treatment of comminuted patellar fractures: with and without eversion. METHODS In a retrospective series of cases of comminuted patellar fractures treated at a single center between 2014 and 2017, with a follow-up 3 months , we performed a comparison between the eversion group and the non-eversion group. The exclusion criteria were partial or total patellectomy, tendon reinsertion, or incomplete rehabilitation. The variables analyzed were age, gender, smoking, diabetes mellitus, the energy of the accident, the fracture type, surgical variables (tension band, screws, wires, knots, circular cerclage), postoperative joint range of motion (ROM), presence of symptomatic osteosynthesis, the scores on the functional scales (of Tegner-Lysholm and of Kujala) at the final discharge, complications (joint stiffness, infection, deep vein thrombosis), and pre- and postoperative computed tomography imaging variables (gap, step-off > 2mm, intra-articular fixation elements). RESULTS In total, 20 out of 22 patients, 13 undegoing eversion and 7 not undergoing eversion, met the selection criteria.. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 12 months, and there were no statistically significant differences regarding the demographic variables between both groups, which makes them comparable. The most remarkable results were the time from admission to final discharge, of 7 months for the patients in the eversion group, and of 5 months for those in the non-eversion group (p » 0.032), the proportion of patients with a step-off > 2 mm, with 7.7% for the eversion group and 14.3% for the non-eversion group (p » 0.016), and a tendency towards higher scores in the functional scales for the eversion group. CONCLUSION The treatment of comminuted patellar fractures with eversion seems to be a viable alternative, given its superior imaging and functional results compared to those of the usual technique.

Patellar retraction versus eversion on functional outcomes in total knee replacement: a randomized controlled study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Patellar mobilization technique during total knee replacement (TKR) has been debated, with some suggesting that lateral retraction, rather than eversion, of the patella may be beneficial. This randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effects of patellar eversion on functional outcomes in TKR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled test will be conducted in Jingjiang People's Hospital. Primary end-stage osteoarthritis patients that prepared for unilateral TKR were randomized to one of two patellar exposure techniques during the primary total knee arthroplasty: lateral retraction or eversion. The informed consent will be acquired in each patient. The primary outcome was operation time, length of hospital stay, and straight leg raising time. Second outcomes including Insall-Salvati ratio; range of motion at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year following TKR; visual analog scale (VAS) at 1 month, 3 months; and Knee Society Score (KSS) score at 1 year following TKR. The significance level was defaulted as P < .05. RESULTS: Results will be published in relevant peer-reviewed journals. CONCLUSION: Our study aims to systematically assess the functional outcomes of patellar eversion for TKR patients, which will provide clinical guidance for TKR patients.

Postoperative clinical outcome between lateral retraction and eversion of patella following simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Among the various exposure technique used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); the midline medial parapatellar knee approach is most commonly performed; which require mobilisation of patella for adequate surgical exposure. In this study, we compare the effect of patellar eversion with lateral retraction in simultaneous bilateral TKA to find out difference in postoperative clinical outcome between the two patellar mobilisation techniques. METHODS: We enrolled 41 patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous TKR (82 knees) from Nov 2016 to Dec 2018. During surgery patellar eversion was done in one knee and lateral retraction was done in other knee selecting them randomly to reduce the bias. During the follow up period achieving unassisted active straight leg raise (SLR), 90 flexion and complications were recorded. Measurement of Oxford knee society score (OKSS), American knee society score (AKSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and quadriceps strength (measured by handheld dynamometer) was done daily up to one week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: The time of achieving active SLR and 90∗ flexion postoperatively was quicker in the lateral retraction group with a statistically significant difference. VAS pain score at 1 week and 1 month along with quadriceps strength in 1-month had statistically significant favourable outcomes in the lateral retraction group. Throughout the follow up lateral retraction group had better Oxford and American knee score but the difference being statistically insignificant. No significant difference was found on the complication rate. CONCLUSION: In comparison to lateral retraction, patellar eversion has an adverse effect in early knee functional recovery after TKA; it delays achieving active SLR, 90∗ flexion and has unfavourable outcome in functional scores, quadriceps strength, and postoperative pain relief. However it has minimal effects on long term functional outcomes.

Optimal Handling of the Patella in Tourniquet-Free Total Knee Arthroplasty: Eversion or Lateral Retraction?

OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal handling of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without the intraoperative application of a tourniquet. METHODS: A total of 104 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA without the intraoperative use of tourniquets from December 2018 to March 2019 in our center were included in this prospective randomized double-blinded study, including 42 men and 62 women with a mean age of 66.3 ± 7.8 years and a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Patients were randomly divided into an eversion group (n = 52) and a retraction group (n = 52) based on the intraoperative handling of the patella (eversion or lateral retraction). Primary outcome measures, including the visual analog scale at rest (rVAS) and the visual analog scale in motion (mVAS) for both anterior knee pain and thigh pain, opioid consumption, active range of motion (aROM), passive range of motion (pROM), the time needed for return of the straight-leg raise (SLR), and 90° knee flexion, were recorded by an independent observer, who also noted secondary outcome measures, including operation time, length of stay (LOS), patella-related (patellar tilt and baja) and other complications, knee swelling, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline parameters. At 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively (PO), patients in the eversion group experienced more severe thigh pain than those in the retraction group (24 h: 2.6 ± 0.8 vs 2.2 ± 0.5 [P = 0.003]; 48 h: 2.0 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 0.4 [P = 0.026]; 72 h: 1.1 ± 0.4 vs 0.9 ± 0.5 [P = 0.012], respectively) and consumed more opioids (24 h: 22.3 ± 7.7 vs 15.1 ± 8.9 mg [P < 0.001]; 48 h: 27.3 ± 9.3 vs 21.4 ± 10.5 mg [P = 0.003]; 72 h: 23.1 ± 8.2 vs 19.8 ± 7.6 mg [P = 0.036], respectively), but no significant difference was found in anterior knee pain (both rVAS and mVAS) preoperatively or at 24, 48 or 72 h, 3 weeks, 2 or 6 months, or 1 year PO (P > 0.05). Throughout the 1-year follow-up, patients in the retraction group showed significantly better function, including greater aROM and pROM at all time points (P < 0.05) and a shorter period of time needed for return to SLR (1.9 ± 0.7 vs 2.2 ± 0.8 days [P = 0.044]) and 90° knee flexion (1.2 ± 0.7 vs 1.9 ± 0.8 days [P < 0.001]). In addition, no between-group difference was found in operation time, complication rate, swelling of the knee, or SF-12 score during the follow-up period (P > 0.05). The eversion group had a significantly longer LOS (5.61 ± 1.92 vs 4.93 ± 1.45 days [P = 0.044]) and worse HSS score within 2 months PO (3 weeks PO: 77.4 ± 7.6 vs 81.7 ± 7.2 [P = 0.004]; 2 months PO: 85.1 ± 7.2 vs 88.5 ± 6.1 [P = 0.011]), but at the third follow-up (6 months PO), the HSS score in the two groups became comparable (P > 0.05). No patellar tilt occurred in either group and there was only one case of patellar baja in the eversion group, with no significant between-group difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend lateral retraction rather than eversion for optimal handling of the patella during TKA because the postoperative functional recovery is better and thigh pain is relatively less severe.

Semiextended approach for intramedullary nailing via a patellar eversion technique for tibial-shaft fractures: Evaluation of the patellofemoral joint.

Intramedullary nail fixation is a common treatment for tibial-shaft fractures, and it offers a better functional prognosis than other conservative treatments. Currently, the primary approach employed during intramedullary nail insertion is the semiextended position is the suprapatellar approach, which involves a vertical incision of the quadriceps tendon Damage to the patellofemoral joint cartilage has been highlighted as a drawback associated with this approach. To avoid this issue, we perform surgery using the patellar eversion technique and a soft sleeve. This method allows the articular surface to be monitored during intramedullary nail insertion. We arthroscopically assessed the effect of this technique on patellofemoral joint cartilage. The patellar eversion technique allows a direct view and protection of the patellofemoral joint without affecting the patella. Thus, damage to the patellofemoral joint cartilage can be avoided.

Patellar non-eversion in primary TKA reduces the complication rate.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the isolated benefits of patellar non-eversion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA statement. A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was performed in August 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that considered the handling of the patella as the only variable were included in our review. Quality assessment of RCTs was performed according to the CONSORT statement. The meta-analysis was performed to pool the available data for some parameters. RESULTS: The searches of the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases yielded 10 RCTs, and five RCTs were selected for inclusion in the review. This results suggested that tourniquet time [mean difference (MD) = -5.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.77 to -1.60], length of hospitalization (MD = 1.24; 95% CI 0.54-1.94) and the incidence of complications [odds ratio (OR) = 2.23; 95% CI 1.12-4.44] differed significantly between the eversion group and non-eversion group. No differences in postoperative pain, alignment, and the Insall-Salvati ratio were observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: The patellar non-eversion approach offers a shorter length of hospitalization and lower incidence of postoperative complications, but requires more operative time. The merits of patellar non-eversion for recovery of knee function remain controversial, and more high-quality RCTs are needed to draw clear conclusions. In general, avoidance of patellar eversion is recommended when exposing the knee joint for TKA.

No difference in clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty between patellar eversion and non-eversion.

PURPOSE: Multiple surgical techniques in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are associated with clinical differences. However, whether patellar eversion impairs clinical outcomes remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide current understanding on this topic. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases was performed to identify RCTs comparing patellar eversion with patellar non-eversion (PN). Two authors independently selected the studies, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data. RESULTS: Five RCTs involving 379 knees were included. The results revealed no significant differences in functional scores, pain, quality of life, quadriceps strength, patellar height, alignment, or complication rate between patellar eversion and PN. Power analysis showed that the power of the individual study and meta-analysis ranged from 5.0 to 70.8%, with the exception of the power of alignment and patellar height in two of the individual studies, which was 100.0 and 99.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current evidence, patellar eversion during TKA could not definitely lead to inferior postoperative outcomes. Patellar eversion and patellar non-eversion could achieve similar clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review and meta-analysis, Level I.

Failure of the Patellar Tendon with the Patella Everted versus Noneverted in a Matched-Pair Cadaver Model.

Avoidance of patellar eversion during total knee arthroplasty may help to prevent injury to the patellar tendon. The purpose of this study was to compare the load-to-failure of the everted versus the noneverted patella in a cadaveric model. Fourteen cadaver knees (seven pairs) were loaded to failure with the patella everted in one knee and not everted in the other. Mean load-at-ultimate failure in the patella-everted group was 1,111 ± 572 N, and in the patella-noneverted group was 1,621 ± 683 N (p = 0.01). Additionally, loads-at-initial-partial failure were lower (p = 0.04) in the patella-everted compared to the patella-noneverted group, 573 ± 302 N versus 1,115 ± 358 N, respectively. A partial failure of the patellar tendon occurred in 100% of the everted specimens, whereas only 57% of the noneverted specimens had partial failure. These findings suggest patella eversion may lead to failure of the patellar insertion at lower loads than when the patella is not everted.